SOCIOLOGICAL READING OF THE POPULAR

TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMPLEXITY OF (HOMO)SEXUAL AND RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN THE SERBIAN SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT

IN SEARCH OF IDENTITY

IDENTITIES IN THE MAKING

THE CONCEPTS OF SECULARISM AND LAICISM: A REPLY TO DARKO TANASKOVIĆ

I have recently suggested differentiation of the term “secularism” from the term “laicism”, so they can be applied to different phenomena. According to this suggestion, the term “secularism” would continue to denote indifference or opposition to the presence of religion in the public domain, whereas the term “laicism” would be used to denote emphasis of the laic role in ecclesiastic affairs. While Radovan Bigović has shown openness to this proposal, Darko Tanasković has expressed a certain distance. The reasons for his distance are the subject of this text.

IN THE CONTEXT OF COMMUNICATION